Monday 2 July 2012

Mr. Moody’s Mood

BaldOpinion 10
02 July 2012

I wish that I was not going to write this piece. I have to though. The subject matter is painfully close to me, maybe too emotional for me, maybe unnecessarily emotional.  You be the judge.
Nonetheless, the situation I depict is real, sad, but real, particularly as I witness the degradation setting in, the reinforcement, the acceptance… and the decline of the people from whose loins I come.
I no longer live with my disparate people, but I shall never deny who I think I am and where I come from.
The mule is an interesting animal.  It is the offspring of a donkey stallion, a jack, and a horse mare. Hinnies, however, is the opposite in that this breed is the result of a cross between a stallion horse and a donkey jennet. For ease of reference, both are described as mules.
Folklore has it that when asking the mule about its parentage it, the mule, shall refer to the horse and to the donkey only under duress. 
Stereotypes inform norms.  In this instance the norm is accepted.  The donkey is stupid and stubborn.  The horse is elegant and intelligent.  The science people write that the average donkey is more intelligent when compared to the average horse.
Cape Town is a city in South Africa – often mistakenly referred to as the Mother City. 
We were driving, and the talk was on the radio. For good reason I was extra attentive. A diuretic sounding voice told about the need to change the name from Cape Town to //Hui !Gaeb. 
The would be proposed new name has properties reminiscent of a modern day email address, yet, the name seeks to establish what, according to the diuretic speech, is the original name.
That woman was being serious.
The South African, like any other national, is a very interesting person. It is often said how complex the South African political situation is.  I can’t see the complexity, can you?
Here’s my brief interpretation of the history:
The dark-skinned people moved into the country from the North of the continent. Where was the mother city?
The fair-skinned people moved into the country mainly from the North, but via the sea and landed at one of the many capes in South Africa.
Once upon a time, a long, long… long time ago, the fair-skinned people had dark skins and lived in Africa. They left to seek whatever turned them on at the time. The result is that their skins, amongst other features, changed; because of the climate. They developed fair skins, but it took a long time.  Methuselah’s mother was probably not born, let alone pregnant, so long ago it was.  Ooh, but we ignore this because someone must have decided that the latter migration took place too long ago to matter.  I ask again, “How long is long ago?”
Okay, so, the dark-skinned folk arrived from across the land and the fair-skinned people arrived mainly from across the sea.
On arriving the fair-skinned folk met two groups who refer to themselves as Khoikhoi and Khoisan respectively. They were either hunter-gatherers, pastoralists or they were part of a nomadic group, the original farmers.
The fair-skinned people, mainly men, saw these yellow-skinned folk and traded. Over time they also exchanged bad habits, language, sex and religion.
The dark-skinned people came down from the north, across the land.  When they met the yellow skinned Khoi similar relationships to those the Khoi had with the Europeans developed. These relations included a few wars. In fact, a few wars between the Khoikhoi and the Khoisan are also recorded. 
The iconic, Nelson Mandela, is genealogically proven to be of Khoikhoi ancestry.
Over the past four centuries one group always sought to dominate, or rule another; much to the chagrin of the often small in number and therefore less powerful Khoi peoples.
Later, the fair-skinned people also fought with each other.  There were two such wars between mainly the English and the off-spring of the Dutch.  These two separate wars lasted a total of FOUR (4) years, but there were many other warring groups too. 
Due to various liaisons between the dark-skinned, yellow-skinned and fair-skinned people, a community came to be that were neither Khoi, fair-skinned, or dark skinned.  They were the left–over people, the as a result of people, the half breeds, the bastards.  All of this in a fast becoming skin-tone obsessed society where the fair skin was king.  Many groups moved closer to the big City, Cape Town.  Once there, relations between persons originating from South East Asia, Mauritius and Madagascar also influenced the emerging populace who were not strictly defined by culture and religion, but who increasingly became sub-sets of their masters, the fair-skinned persons of European decent.
Labeling continued. The only group who retained their first names were the Muslim slaves.  These people brought their own religion to the Cape, Islam. They originated from the aforesaid countries, countries that included Malaysia, hence the colloquial term referring to slaves from Malaysia, Slams(e), or Cape Malay people.
The urbanised Khoi, the left-over group, traded their identity and took on European names and surnames and mainly strove to emulate those values and the lifestyle which they observed from their masters, the European people. 
It may be near heretic for me to allege that the mule syndrome has from that time affected how this disparate group assesses itself. In my experience, when asked about his European surname the answer would often be about the German, Dutch, or English grandfather, but never about the Khoi, dark-skinned, St Helena, or slave grandmother.  It is known that the European Governments often sent errant officials to Cape Town – as a form of punishment when they were naughty. It stands to reason that these officials were errant in the Cape, far away from their bosses’ gaze.
The labeling never stopped.  The disparate group of left-over / as a result of people needed a name.  Many were embarrassed about their Khoi ancestry.  The Europeans named the Khoikhoi, “Hottentots” and the Khoisan was called “Bushman”.  The dark-skinned groups have their own derogatory name for the Khoi (Batwa, Abatwa – small person). How does “Men of Men” and “True People” compare to small person?
Then Europeans decided that the growing disparate group should be labeled differently. Plurals, mixed and then finally, the Cape Coloured became the preferred label. Fair-skinned people of European ancestry allocated the label, Coloured, and the mainly brown-skinned people accepted this definition. 
Today many of these people refer to themselves by the imposed and derogatory term, Coloured. As a person of mixed parentage I find the label Coloured to be a bastard term. It is a term used to describe those in South Africa who are in excess, as a result of people.  It is a term created by the Verwoerd Administration.  Verwoerd was the creator of apartheid, a social, political and economic system that set out to legitimize superiority amongst people as determined by the colour of their skins, shape of their noses and texture of their hair.  It is this term, “Coloured”, this bastard term that was further legitimized by the Nelson Mandela Administration and the ANC ruling party in South Africa.
South Africa continues to claim that it subscribes to the principle of non-racism. I put it to you, South Africa is more racist today than it was during the Apartheid era. In South Africa I continue to be defined by the colour of my skin. Therefore, my skin tone continues to give me discrimination in South Africa.
Meanwhile, the same practice of labeling dark-skinned groups “kaffirs” and “bantu” was dropped in favour of self-determined names like Zulu, Xhosa, Venda, Ndebele, Shangaan-Tsonga, Sotho and many more.  To use the term “kaffir” in reference to a dark-skinned person is a criminal offense in South Africa.
It is fine, even correct and legitimate to refer to people with no consistent common heritage by the derogatory mongrel term, “Coloured”.  
My view is that those who label themselves Xhosa, Zulu, Indian, Griekwa, Baster and whatever else, they should be free to do so. Those who wish not to be labeled, or who cannot be labeled, because of the disparate nature of who we are, those people should be free to be people, South African people, because we live here. Why make the blood that courses through my veins the curse of my life?
The above is reason too, why Cape Town is Cape Town, viz. it is a geographical description of the town which situate is a land formation alongside the sea described as a cape.
A long while back, whilst visiting, for inspiration (served in a bottle), I met an elderly gentleman.  He introduced himself, “I am James Edwin Moody”.  Mr. Moody was visiting the pub long before I arrived. We slowly played pool, sipped on the inspiration and then sat to enjoy more – others told their spouses of the “book club meeting” they were attending, so the discussions were varied.  Mr. Moody and I, a few others, we sat aside and spoke about that, this, music of course and other world problems that as the evening grew a beard we became more inspired to define.
My name was asked, the genealogy questioned and I answered. 
Said Mr. Moody,   “St Helena, your Mum is St Helenian?”; …he wore a wry smile and gently said “Once I had a girlfriend from that West Coast Island, Saint Helena; they look similar to Indian folk, those people, islanders…”. “Not my mother”, I thought. My mother would be too old for this Moody, but age assessed against an indigenous skin is often deceptive. (At 90, my mother only has a small clutch of grey hairs.)
The discussion roamed from this, to that, the music, always the music, and back to the meaning of being classified “Coloured”; or “so-called Coloured”, said Mr. Moody as he readies to tell about his great grandfather who worked for an English gentleman in Constantia, “up where they grow a fine vine, near Cape Town”. This landlord wore the last name, Moody.  Later the workers each took this name to define where they lived, worked and in some instances, because that person owned them. It is with pride that Mr. Moody’s Dad named him after the English farmer… “You see, that is how I got my name”.
With reference to the Jamie Uys film, The Gods Must Be Crazy, Mr. Moody said, “Today I may look like Dawid Kruiper (http://www.google.co.za/#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=dawid+kruiper+pictures&oq=dawid+kruiper+pictures&gs_l=hp.3...4349.11362.0.12096.22.22.0.0.0.0.576.6009.3-1j5j6.12.0...0.0.7IMpeDo8Gw8&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=ef3e47e2b0254e7b&biw=1093&bih=521) though my name represents nothing of where I come from. I wonder whether Dawid Kruiper’s name resonates with where he comes from…” I remember the sudden somber turn of that discussion.
 I sat, listening, and the moment clouded me too. I know that change is permanent; that a better tomorrow is not possible if we hanker after a near past - a past that is riddled with dispossession, displacement, robbery, rape, pillaging and so-called philanthropy. What merit is there should Mr. Moody have changed his name to //Xegwi, or if the vexed woman of the radio talk too, changes her name?

“Oh what the hell”, said Mr. Johnson (another of the long time visitors who had joined us earlier),”let’s have another round of inspiration boys - and James, play that piece, the one,…. the one with you, where you sound like a murder of crows being helped along by that most beautiful woman…, what is the piece called?”
 We each had a stab at guessing, but all were wrong.
“Moody’s Mood!” shouted Mr. Ngcukana whilst leaning over to take aim on the pool table.  He had been listening to the discussion all the while, said “If there’s a cloud up above us now, go on and let it rain…” I sensed he too was a tad sad.
Mr. James Moody died in December 2010 – he was 85.

19 comments:

  1. Another riveting piece of writing, thank you. I learned from you again. About donkeys and horses, about a murder of crows and that there is an alternative to the madness of having to have a colour define who I am.

    I heard you speak on this subject some years ago. You were answering the question, what are you. You pretended not to know what was meant by this foolish question. Eventually the person said, are you white, or are you coloured. I saw the offended cloud in your face and your response, excuse if I do not get the words exactly right. You said “I am of mixed parents and I reject being labeled. In fact, I feel insulted by the labels you mention. I am a person. I am a South African person and that is what I am, to hell with your labels.”

    I sensed the determination in your words and it has stayed with me since. You are a wonderful human being. Thank you for this writing – I look forward to the next and the next and the next.

    The music is cute – did you know that James Moody wrote that song?

    ReplyDelete
  2. My Boy, this is a long time coming.

    I wondered when you were going to write this - I suppose not the only reader to think so. You seem to writing for an audience other than only South Africans and that is not a bad thing, but I think that South Africans should read this more particularly. The points you raise are factually correct and free of the clutter that our experiences here so frequently cloud how we assess the past. All groups have contributed both positively and negatively and it is always the stronger groups that seem to call the shots, then we spend all the time we have bickering about the detail instead of re-focusing on the macro issues. People must be encouraged to disagree and hold their own views, but it is more important to take the facts and move on so that the detail in future do not serve to replicate the ugly of the past, but instead determine a newness serving to bring correction. The South African way is flawed, you can see it, but mainly because the planning, debates and discourse use the detail instead of the macro lessons that are obvious and here repeated / summarised.

    I did not find the article emotional at all. I found it factual, I found it enlightening and; the reading was, for me, entertaining almost in a macabre way – probably the style of your writing. I want to join that book club!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lovely Bald Opinion again, but apart from the lovely story, what are the points that you are making? What is the resolve. You stand aside and make noises that an insignificant number of people hear, but even those who hear are so swept up by your story telling gift that they lose the integral point you make.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wonder why mainstream media is not publishing work about this matter. Instead they publish, ad nauseam about some or other criminal politician, errant government official and a police commissioner who compares her job with a drunk owning a bottle store.

    This debate, like it or not, share the same understanding or not, this discussion will stimulate a broader understanding of who we are as people and do things that will render the smaller things that we obsess about in there correct context and eventually it will be minimized.

    A brave article Bald Opinion!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Today is American independence day. For four years I have been in this country. I remember my people with fondness, but when I go back then I shall remember my American people with fondness too.

    I read this article and I am transported to a place where I would rather not be. I do not want to be reminded of the past in a manner that is obvious in how it determines what I am. I am a medical person and I think constantly that we are what we eat, but this article suggests that I am based on who my parents were. The reality is that it is two past examples with two very similar and significant impacts on who I am - the food I eat and my lineage.

    For me the lesson is (apart from the entertainment value) that we are consumed by the trivia that we create, whereas had we developed a sense of understanding what it means to be a person, not a “fair-skin, Dark-skin, yellow-skin, brown-skin, but merely a person in this world then many of the prejudices we so glibly refer to as discrimination, or in South Africa, racism will most likely have a more relevant context.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What a tragic tale you tell Mr. Bald! Throughout you constantly relate stories that conclude with the impression that we should forget about the past and focus on the future instead. How childish!

    Why, instead of all this talk about the future do you not focus, as an alternative, on all the talent from the Cape and how that is contributing to the changing world? Think about the talented people that due to the past had to relocate and focus their talents for other countries to enjoy, all because they were too “fair-skinned”, but not “fair-skinned” enough to make their contributions in their home towns. Why are you not mentioning them.

    I think that you hide behind a synonym and you are merely a bitter white man, living in a white world with a liberal hanker and a pretentious flare that leads him to want to identify with what it feels like to be a Ham person. Yes, you forget about this label, or maybe your advisors never briefed you! They stopped short with Methuselah . I know that you will delete this comment and the reason you will is because there are people like me who see through you. Not all people think that you are as wonderful as some of the fools who write on this page do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But why does it matter if the writer is white or not? That is exactly the point, is it not? Today should no longer be about what was, but about what can be.

      Delete
    2. You are right anonymous ...the colour or race of the writer is of no consequence. Race has no scientific basis, it is a human construction and with it came racial consciousness, ideology and narratives, etc. The writer may be pitch black, but much of his writing is from a white, colonial perspective and would find resonance in these quarters. That does not make the writer a bad fellow, or even a racist, it just means he mobilises meaning from within particular discourses. It may find some support in cyberspace, which is still confined to elites, but does not speak to the experiences of the majority of South Africans.

      Delete
    3. Actually Shamila, this piece is well researched and written and very informative. Where it would lose credibility for most South Africans is with the comment that South Africa today is more racist than it was under apartheid. This shows that the writer has very little personal experience of the racist horrors of apartheid as they were visited on millions of us. Furthermore, and much more cynically, statements like these provide a justification for those perpetrators and supporters of apartheid who have not come to terms with the immense suffering it imposed on their fellow citizens.
      Be that as it may, we need to respect all voices in our beautiful country. With frank exchanges of ideas, will come better understandings.

      Delete
    4. Hi Hairy

      I have been reading your comments for a long time. Very interesting where you play ball and I see that BaldOpinion protects you in a way. Other pages would have used the delete button, but I think our discussion is mature in this blog.

      Yes, I agree, the story is interesting, informative, but I think also logical, particularly given that the detail does not form the crux of the focus here. The latter is good, refreshing and probably what makes the piece so informative - and the music, let’s not forget the music – my favourite is the George Benson version of Moody’s Mood for Love, back from the older tracks, Weekend in LA, etc.

      On the question of South Africa being more racist than it was, I am afraid that I have to agree with Bald. In the past we were clustered into sameness, so much so that there would be turf wars between the different tribes who converged in SOWETO, where I hail from, but now the turf wars are formalized legalized and institutionalized. Go to the workplace, the schools and any other official entity in South Africa and you will notice how much more the focus is on what colour skin you have.

      I am an engineer, and therefore have a rare skill, but had I been an Human Resources Professional then I would have landed a job with a top company in South Africa. This landing would have been based not on my ability, training, experience and whether I fit in to the role together with the people I am to work with, but because I am a black female. This is one example in a sea of similar examples. It was not like that in the past and it need not be like this in the present. Yes, birds of a feather flock and we are not birds, so therefore we have to break the tendency, we are replacing the same with a different flock and the basis is at least as racist as the past basis.

      The past had other evils, we could not live where we wanted, own property, love, marry, worship, school, etc. Today the latter has not changed much, mainly because of economic dictates, but the limitations are elsewhere, at least the same and in most instances worse because of the numbers that now apply what they learned from the previous masters?

      Take care.

      Delete
  7. The people in Constantia, Houghton and Bishop's Court will invariably toast the writer with red wine or tea and scones as they ponder the state of the nation. Below the railway, those of us who lived through the horrors of apartheid (the few who have access to the cyber world), just shake our heads and laugh as we prepare for the next round of dominoes in a smoke filled room. The writer is congratulated by the Colonial Club, who are delighted at his playing brown against black, the oldest trick in the colonial arsenal. And when he insults victims of apartheid by stating that our country is more racist now than it was under apartheid, there must be outpourings of joy in the Colonial Club, as if their team had just scored in a world cup final. Meanwhile apartheid's victims think of the humiliation we experienced of being denied the franchise, access to beaches, restaurants and schools, standing in a bus where there were seats available that were reserved for the superior people, being teargassed, detained, tortured, exiled, arrested for pass law 'crimes', kept out of jobs, and so on. Under apartheid we could not even crap in the same toilet as the superior people and were forbidden from marrying of loving who we chose to. Homelands were created for excess people and death camps for troublesome ones. The writer was either a beneficiary of the system, has the medical condition amnesia or lived on another planet at the time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I saw your reply to Herrick yesterday Hairy and here you repeat much of that, but I am not clear how this is a comment the content of this article. I see that you have moved on from "Colonial Scribes" to "Colonial Club". You ned to be careful though becasue you must not be in receipt of a red card in this final becasue the "sin-bin" is frequented only by "colonial scribes". :)

      Delete
    2. Or maybe the writer was not yet born!

      Thanks for that Hairy. I think that at times you have to give credit where credit is due too. I, like you, I suppose have been exposed to less than fair treatment. I think that we need to understand giving and receiving discrimination. You cannot give discrimination only because you have received it.

      South Africa today is giving discrimination because discrimination was received. Is this fair?

      The majority of people are now in a position to legally, not economically, but legally they are in a position to give discrimination and the only reason put forward is because they, or their parents, received discrimination. This is not valid and therefore my reason for supporting Bald when he argues that South Africa today is more discriminatory than it was – ask the recipients of service delivery at home affairs, from municipalities, those who need the police, go to hospitals, call a government department, send their children to school, ask those people and hear what they have to say, then decide whether you want to continue with your cucumber sandwich argument.

      Delete
    3. Majority, what do you know about a majority? Majority views are only valid after they have been tested. You assume that because the bigger percentage of people have darker skins that all their views are the same and that it therefore constitutes a majority. That is not logical, right and I think that a person of your obvious intelligence realises this. Why are you not applying it then?

      My short story is that I am part of change from the birth of the new South Africa. This is before everything started going down. Many times I think about the points made by Mr. Bald Opinion here in this article, but I was not able to put it like he does. You have to admit that he is a gifted man. I am just a factory worker. I worked on the floor as a machinist for 20 years here in Saltriver. I became a shopsteward for NUTW, ACTWUSA, SACTWU. I went to nights school and am a bookkeeper in the same factory.

      My eldest son was murdered. The murderer went to jail. He was freed two months ago. My son is dead. I want the death penalty to apply. I agreed with the ANC that the death penalty is bad because a eye for a eye is not right. This is my son and I have a different experience. A eye for a eye is nota good argument. I want justice. I want fairness and I know that the victims of this crime that is bigger than any other crime I have seen in Hannover Park are saying to hell with the ANC, to hell with the majority view because we are the majority and we want fairness. What majority are they talking about who do not want fairness like to set my pain in a place where it is not haunting me? I lost my child and you tell me about majority – the majority is often wrong and I want fairness.

      Delete
    4. Dear Mariam

      Thank you for responding to this writing. You make me very sad and I try to share in your sadness, but I know that I shall never succeed because that sadness you suffer is bigger than I can understand, for it is a sadness that only a mother and a father will know. I am fortunate that I do not know that pain and to say sorry is not medicine.

      Somtyds praat os sommer soner om lekke daaroor te dink en dan isit ees na die tyd wat os realise watte impact os woorde het. Soe leer os somtyds. Ek sê oek somtyds iets wat mense seer maak en dan wiet ekkie hoe omit trug te trekkie.

      Ose land issie lekke nie, ma os moet praat, want is deerie praat wat os ‘n understanding gan develop. Somtyds praat mense goed wat Mariam nie sal mee agree nie en al issit seer moet hulle soe kan praat; but soe moet os oek kan respond. Mariam moet lat hulle hulle goed sê want os amal kyk mos die wêreld deer die filter van os eie different eksperiences en; somtyds dink os dat ose eksperience rede genoeg is om ienage anne person wat miskien ‘n different interpretation het in te sê.

      Say thank you to the other people there who read my pieces. Sometimes get their replies on email, texts to my mobile phone and even via messages from people I meet in the strangest of places. It makes my heart sing that I can get people to respond, even if they do not agree with what I say, because I am just a person too, after all.

      Thank you
      Cas

      Delete
  8. Waarheit

    Ekit nourie dag gepraat met 'n familie van Wynberg. Hulle saak is in die Land Claims Court. Hulle groot oupa het land in Konstansie gekoep in 1902. Sy siens het die land van hom gekoop vir 'n getal ponde in 1950 someting. Die waarde in rand was R22 500. Die Groep AReas het gekom. Hulle was GEFORS om die land te verkoep vir R13 400. Vandag is die land werd R134 million. Ek het die nommers neegeskryf want dit lyk soos iets uit 'n science fiction movie. Kan nie waar wiessie. Dit is erger as wat me my en my familie in vriende gebeur het. Ons was maar net opgesluit, gedonner en later weer vrygelaat. Maar die familie was beroof in broad daylight. Die gesteelere was met die support van die rasistiese wette. Drie miljoen mense was uit hulle huise gesmuit. Dis maar net die rasisme van een wet. Ons moet nog baie dinge regsit, en ons gaan, want ons is dai ouens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What language is this? It looks like Flemish? Karen - Vancouver, Canada

      Delete
    2. Dear Karen The language is Afrikaans, largely a derivative of Dutch. Flemish, as you probably know, is the Belgian variant of Dutch. In Cape Town, we speak Afrikaans, Xhosa and English. Those are how official provincial languages since 1994, when apartheid ended.

      My comment regards a family that bought land in Cape Town for R22 400 in the 50s and were forced to sell it in terms of the apartheid Group Areas Act for R13 400. The land is now worth R134 million. Three million people were forcibly removed under just this one piece of racist legislation. The extent of this legal robbery is almost too huge to comprehend. I was making this point because we have apartheid denialists in South Africa and so the millions of us who suffered under the system must set the record straight. We cannot allow ourselves to be humiliated twice in one lifetime.

      Delete
    3. Dear Hairy,
      Firstly, this is not Afrikaans. It is but a dialect of Afrikaans.
      Secondly, how presumptuous of you to make statements like the ones you make. Many people felt the negative impacts of apartheid. In many different ways. Writing that the writer probably did not experience the effects of apartheid is just so wrong. This blog is a forum for airing our views, but surely insults are not necessary.
      Dear Bald Opinion,
      Thank you for sharing your views and experiences with the broad public. What South Africa needs, is politicians who view the world like you do. How about that?

      Delete